test function - borderintegral

Neue Frage »

clancy Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »
test function - borderintegral
Meine Frage:
hello

if , i.e. is a test function on the two dimensional unit ball,

then the borderintegral

is the same as the borderintegral



but why?

Meine Ideen:
i guess it has something to do with the feature that as a test function has compact support within .. but i dont know how to make this clear


is there somebody to help?

greetings
Che Netzer Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »
RE: test function - borderintegral
If (or ?) is a test function on , it has to vanish on (i.e. on a neighborhood of it).
Now think about how to write as the union of two sets.
clancy Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »
RE: test function - borderintegral
hi ché netzer - thank you for answering that quickly!

sorry for my disturbing mixture of notation
i mean the same function

Zitat:
Original von Che Netzer
If (or ?) is a test function on , it has to vanish on (i.e. on a neighborhood of it).


oh - why?? i cannnot see it

Zitat:

Now think about how to write as the union of two sets.


i guess

.

if vanishes on as you say then it is clear that it is enough to integrate over .
Che Netzer Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »
RE: test function - borderintegral
Zitat:
Original von clancy
oh - why?? i cannnot see it

We assume that the support of is a compact subset of . Thus it must have a positive distance to the border of the open (!) set : If it would "touch" that border, it could not be completely contained in .
If we could not find any open neighborhood of some which does not intersect the support, then would be a limiting point of .

Zitat:
i guess
.

Exactly Freude
clancy Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »

ah!

1. is the OPEN unit ball

2. and is compact - and therefore especially closed

?


in general the support of a testfunction is a REAL subset of the concerning set?
Che Netzer Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »

Zitat:
Original von clancy
1. is the OPEN unit ball

I guess so (and at least we always defined it to be open – you surely did so as well). If it were closed, it would not make much sense.

Zitat:
2. and is compact - and therefore especially closed

Well, first we have . But as a compact set cannot be open, "" follows immediately.

Zitat:
in general the support of a testfunction is a REAL subset of the concerning set?

In most cases, one considers testfunction on an open set. Then surely the support has to be a real subset. But for a compact set , we simply have . That would be quite boring Augenzwinkern
 
 
clancy Auf diesen Beitrag antworten »

now i understood

thank you very much!
Neue Frage »
Antworten »



Verwandte Themen

Die Beliebtesten »
Die Größten »
Die Neuesten »